JPMorgan Staff Report 'Paranoia' Amid Increased Company Surveillance
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
"We pretend to work, and they pretend to pay."
Surveillance societies are highly dysfunctional and destructive. You either have trust- or you do not have a company, one way or the other.
It's quite an interesting read.
I'd personally prefer living out in the sticks, growing my own food rather than being subjected to this level of monitoring.
In fact it's likely that intelligence agencies are building similar psychological profiles on all of us based on our Internet activity. With machine learning to infer things about us in ways we could never anticipate. Stuff that well and truly rivals East Germany here.
I highly recommend people saying stuff like this to actually try out the said lifestyle for an extended period of time.
It’s not that hard and it turns out sitting at a desk typing all the time is terrible for the body too.
All the curious “hard” labor type lovers I know with diverse hands on experience and depth in numerous topics are living to 90 where as all the butts in seats screen addicts are dying in their 70s.
Paraphrasing Adam Smith who wrote something to the effect of “extreme division of labor will make humans the dumbest creatures known to man.”
Look at people who go into politics for decades; circling the same roleplay. I know a physicist who lives in a state of helplessness they never peeled a potato until their 40s. A man named Farmer is a Farmer for life; old Middle Ages roleplay.
4% of the country hunts and most rely on the JIT logistics games by billionaires for profit extraction because the masses have been propagandized to be incurious and helpless.
We’ve just created another hierarchical social order given 70+ year old politicians and their politicians and siblings grew up with religion and nation state civic life rammed down their throats. Whoever thinks listening to a bunch of religious, post war shellshocked, Cold War paranoids is a good idea is insane themselves.
Oh ageism! Yes against the youth expected to prop up the hallucinated investments of people they don’t know who deflate our buying power to insulate their own and being left with an ecological disaster is ageist.
Online and internet are repetitive.
As you said (twice) this forum is online; I have no idea what syntax and semantics any one will connect with.
Only 14% of the public has more than a bachelors, while public polls suggest public thinks 45% have a masters or better. Even an educated person can be ignorant; they were among the polled.
The world is predominantly non-STEM thinkers who read stories. Even STEM content is metaphor and analogy not exact interpretation.
One comment on the internet rustled your Jimmie’s enough to post empty gibberish. Why take that seriously or sincerely?
The article goes and forth between what data is collected and how it used.
The author speculates data is being used in the most invasive way possible.
I bet they’re collecting lots of data and just sitting on it. It’s there if they need it for a lawsuit.
But the idea your manager is getting notifications because a machine learning algorithm thinks you are less focused than yesterday - that’s not likely.
Come on in, the waters fine. We also have enough tin-foil hats out here for everyone.
Nothing the Insider article describes sounds unusual to me: isn't it standard for virtual workspaces to automatically time out due to inactivity? And anything you do on a work machine or across a work network WILL be recorded.
I am more than sure that JPMC etc will record all sorts of things, as I say. Many for good reason (being legally required to for a start...). I just don't buy that they do anything with the data.
The reddit comment is far more fanciful.
My boss is too busy to know or care whether I am stressed or not, he is busy. The idea that he sits about waiting for a magic AI to tell him I am stressed based on facial recognition etc, and then uses that information for something (what exactly?), seems pretty our of touch with how humans or modern workplaces actually work...
Similarly this just seems paranoid
>Upper management does not care if some employees are more productive when they are working from home. They want everyone back in the office as much as possible so that their WADU profiles are being refined.
So my employer is not employing me for what I produce, they are just pretending they care about that, so they can monitor my stress levels. Because who cares about profit etc when you can have graphs of smiles per hour!? Come on.
At worst this is just JPMC doing what every other employer does, and being sold some AI, Crypto Blockchain, Quantum computing BS software that promises much and does nothing. Then someone karma farming or whatever you call this sort of comment. And people lap it up because it fits the human brains known deviations from reality (you are being watched, people are plotting against you etc). Those factors are more important than the inherent contradictions of the claims themselves...
Probably more things that you dont notice so easily, but it was entirely normal. I am not shocked at all by the "increased" levels described that have come along as the technology matured.
Needless to say, I envy germns and swedish people the most but even countries you would by HN standards consider authoritarian have better privacy protections than the US because what I can do for malware/incident response is red-taped a lot.
I still prefer living here though, I guess you gotta accept the good with the bad.
It is not of much use except to packet sniff your network - unless you have network drives with no passwords on the shares or some other network attached equipment like cameras etc.
Most people are too screwed anyways, they would sync their personal google account on a work machine even lol.
This is why I have a strict policy of never using my personal equipment for work stuff, and never using work equipment for personal stuff. Commingling the two things is just asking for trouble.
John K. Galbraith had something to say about it more than 40 years ago. Nobody actually listened.
Even the Koch brothers decided they needed to stay within the law after losing a number of law suits in the nineties.