>It didn't work, but it still generated it.
So neither could generate the plugin, it's just that one of them lied about it.
So neither could generate the plugin, it's just that one of them lied about it.
It was interesting to see that ChatGPT annotated its code with pitfalls to avoid, that it actually didn't avoid in the code.
Why? I mean, why does it sound more plausible to you that it ever could, when we have countless examples of models lying (or rather hallucinating)?