Maybe the answer is "yes", but I think it's a bit silly, and detracts from the engineering work that goes into building the machine, i.e. the work of understanding the connections and flow of electricity from button press to pumps and gears turning.
If you had a button that switched on a thousand washing machines at a time I guess one could flirt with the title "washing engineer".
was generally called the stoker. Also heard fireman but I find that confusing.
Since that button probably wouldn't work correctly 100% of the time, the operator would probably be forced to learn about problems and solutions related to that activity. Over time, that person would accumulate experience and knowledge which would make them well suited to that simple job of flipping the switch on and off. And at that point, that person would be more of an engineer than a random person who walked up and flipped the switch.
An _anything_ engineer is just someone who does that thing and the unnamed related things necessary to do the main thing.
Maintaining a constant head of steam while changing altitude, water level, external temperature, etc using a direct heat source is a really skilled job. Talk to anyone who works on a heritage railway and they'll explain just how hard it is.
I lived in the same city where George Stephenson invented the locomotive, and went to the same pub that the volunteers who worked on a replica went to. It's fascinating, and very much 'proper' engineering.
Surely we'd agree that not everyone who uses software is a software engineer, but writing software is generally agreed upon as "software engineering". If you consider my comment as a whole, and the linked document, then the application of the definition makes sense.
Large Language Models are incredibly similar to black-box non-deterministic interpreters. And prompt engineering feels very much like writing code for said interpreter.
(I mean - cue the JS jokes and all, but, really?)
Fwiw, to me, writing prompts feels most similar to management, directing, maybe psychotherapy (though I never worked in that, just guessing). Knowing how to adapt and use language to guide the "other" to achieve a goal, but without having insight into the exact way they go about it.
I feel like when I talk to ChatGPT I am directing it. "guide to directing AI bots" has its share of problems too, and "directing prompts" is just flat out unsexy.
2 words surely aren't enough. There's no way to draw one line through that group and get any real meaning (unless maybe it's above the grandma)
So, like in other parts of society, if we don't make new words, people will start using the words we already have.
I want someone to write a sci-fi book where our need for new language snowballs with increased technology and ends up being the great filter for life since it grows until no groups can understand each other.