"One thing that makes me skeptical about the EU long term is the way they seem to view regulation not as an unfortunate necessity, but as an exciting project."
https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1050787382390329345 "One thing that makes me skeptical about the EU long term is the way they seem to view regulation not as an unfortunate necessity, but as an exciting project."
https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1050787382390329345> The main principles of EU law are equality before the law; legal certainty; predictable, clear and comprehensible legal provisions; and transparent legislation. 2 These principles can be upheld only if EU law has the same meaning in all language versions.
“Open to interpretation” has nothing to do with the quote above. It doesn’t matter what the US has and what it does not. We’re not discussing the US here.
When you claim the EU “has no idea” apropos nothing—simply for having a mechanism for interpreting statues in court—it is entirely reasonable to question your double standard.
All major legal jurisdictions have courts to resolve things...
This AI act, together with the CRA, are written by the people who, vast majority of them, never worked with software. Yet, they intend to regulate software. This will go wrong.