19th-century trippers who probed the mind
nautil.us
nautil.us
https://www.waggish.org/2011/benny-shanon-the-antipodes-of-t...
One of the reports of his own experiences with the substance was as follows:
>Another pattern of interpreting-as is one I shall characterize as seeing the particular as generic, or rather, seeing the generic in the particular. I have experienced this on a number of occasions. The first, which for me was very striking, occurred during the daytime. It was in a village and I, intoxicated, was sitting on a small verandah overlooking the meadows. A farmer (a real one) was passing by, and I saw The Farmer, the universal prototype of all farmers. Again, as in the previous example, the standard perception and the non-ordinary one are related. After all, I saw The Farmer, not The Fisherman or The King. Yet, while normally I would have seen just a farmer, this time I saw The Farmer. While semantically linked, experientially these two perceptions are totally different. I have heard accounts of the very same phenomenon from my informants.
--
I've never taken DMT, but I'm curious if people who have can report similar experiences of effectively seeing Platonic forms (or at least, believing they have).
I may have seen "The Garden of Eden" while sitting on a bench in a park on shrooms
And for what it's worth, I have seen a Tetrahedron on DMT with my eyes closed (and it was the calmest Tetrahedron I've ever experienced)
But there is something to be said about culture and language and the Platonic forms that are communicated through writing. The domain of art, psychology, philosophy, mythology, religion, comparative literature, and theatre is chock full of it, and has enough material to keep you busy for five separate lifetimes. Archetypes, metaphors, symbols, and images in these disciplines are all different aspects of these so-called Platonic forms. In the theatrical arts in particular, there is a very strange body of literature surrounding the French troubadours that you may want to start with. The lore suggests that they were using poetry, music, and themes about love to spread these kinds of archetypes.
This all came together as something called the entheogenic hypothesis. It is often used to explain the connection between the evolution of religion and the purported sacraments that may have been used in formal rites. The Eleusinian Mysteries is often referenced as an example. Campbell’s formulation of the "Hero’s journey" is very often seen as a general archetype for the user of these substances in its synthesis of comparative literature (which features these forms as archetypes) and mythology which also translates to religion itself. In Campbell’s formulation, the "boon" that is brought back from the hero, is overlayed and represented in the entheogenic hypothesis as the very informational content that the psychonaut is able to retrieve from the experiences. McKenna often interpreted this as the "logos" but in a more secular context. Lilly and others heard distinct voices giving them instructions. Shanon and others revisited the Abrahamic stories and posited that these voices giving people instructions were equivalent to what ancient people imagined as the voice of god. Still others, like Julian Jaynes, interpreted this idea in a secular way, seeing it more as a story that explains our transition from partial to full consciousness. More recently, the writers of Westworld took a lot of these ideas and applied them to AI, in an attempt to explain how consciousness could eventually emerge again as AGI.
Is there really no way? I can imagine for example conducting a double-blind trial with various psychedelics and controls, and recording the subjects' verbalised experiences during and after the trip. This would give some strong clues as to which aspects of the experience are inherent/neurochemical, and which are culutrally primed.
You can go even further and test it with people that have never heard of psychedelic drugs, let alone been culturally primed. It would take a lot of funding of course, but in principle it's possible.
I totally accept that we know very little about the brain to have a good mechanistic understanding of subjective experience. But I think we're making great progress! A few years ago I went to a lecture by David Nutt, who researches the potential for psilocybin and ketamine therapies to treat depression. What struck me was that it is already possible to measure and talk scientifically about the mechanistic effects of psychedelic drugs on the brain, and how those measured effects correlate to lived experience.
We didn’t speak of it during the trip, but years later when we spoke of the experience, she shared that I became every man she ever knew.
I’ve since had glimpses of that, during soul gazing for example, sober.
In fact Campbell even went to a Grateful Dead show and hung out with the artists. He is exactly correct that a Dead show (now Phish shows) are Dionysian. One has to wonder if he partook:
What he saw reminded him of the Dionysian festivals, palpable proof of his theory that the ancient myths and rituals he studied still echoed today. “This is more than music,” he told his audience. “It turns something on in here [the heart]. And what it turns on is life energy. This is Dionysus talking through these kids.” Campbell's understanding of Dionysus was far deeper and more nuanced than the popular caricature of the happy, wine-soaked god, but his point was not to rehabilitate that older understanding. “It doesn't matter what the name of the god is, or whether it's a rock group or a clergy,” he concluded. “It's somehow hitting that chord of realization of the unity of God in you all.”
It's interesting because psychedelics also dissolve boundaries in many ways, so it's surprising that people don't have more Ship of Theseus-type thoughts.
"Where did the Nitrous go?" I asked finally.
"We got rid of it. Everyone working here were getting too much exposure."
Maybe they know something now that they didn't back then with, (FTA):
> after absorbing as much gas as humanly possible by enclosing himself in an airtight box filled with it for an hour and a quarter
In the first couple chapters, Pollan is trying to link some of the newer (1960s+) perceptions that we have about drug-induced mystical experiences, to those of earlier investigators. He goes back to the noted 1800s American philosopher William James, who wrote Varieties of Religious Experience.
Turns out James was an experimenter with Nitrous. As I remember Pollan's telling, James used a lot of nitrous, and preferred it strongly to some other substances available at the time (that maybe gave less well-controlled experiences?). According to Pollan, it was not a harmful thing. Wiki has a little more (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James#Philosophy_of_re...).
The Pollan book is quite worthwhile, BTW.
That’s why they put B12 in energy drinks.
It’s a collection of 1st hand accounts from one of the countries longest running underground MDMA facilitators. “Anne Other”.
Tucker Max published it, and subsequently had a session with Anne.
This was all years before psychedelics were in the mainstream.
I went on to be mentored by Anne and ran an underground clinic for a few years - PBS even featured me in a docuseries “the mysteries of mental illness episode 4” where I allowed them to come in my apt and film me openly sitting for a woman with PTSD.
Anne Other was a pen name used by the author. It was not Anne Shulgin, although that would have been great to have her mentorship in that way. She is a sweet soul.
I loved when she said “falling in love is the psychedelic everyone has access to in this lifetime… and they’d outlaw that too if they could.”
Book is here: https://www.amazon.com/Trust-Surrender-Receive-Release-Traum...