Why is it that in every other development, these days, one reads a quote like "researchers think this would be used for <insert thing that benefits humanity, but will remain underdeveloped because nobody wants to invest enough money in it> but they warn that it could also be used for <insert very negative possible use, in which many with the resources and power will gladly invest if given the possibility and lack of regulation or control of any type>" and yet, they continue developing it because it might "benefit humanity"? Where the hell are you going like this?!