It's important to distinguish between that and skepticism of existential threat claims used to argue that we must radically rearrange society now to combat it. Not everyone agrees on the best approach to handling climate change. That doesn't make them denialists.

If you think society can adapt and a reasonable reduction of CO2 over time is the best approach using market forces, then for example, degrowth sounds like a bad solution. If you think we're doomed in the next decade, then might as well start geoengineering.