I'd file this under "Not even wrong." What does it matter that there are even more-exploited workers in the world? Does worker exploitation not matter as long as a North Korean farmer (or whoever) is earning less, working more, and suffering regular injury?
ChatGPT and other AI technologies are marketing themselves as futuristic technologies that will revolutionize everything and utterly transform the economy, while also earning untold billions in the process. The fact that a crucial part of the labor is performed not by algorithms but by workers earning less than a living wage is a contradiction ChatGPT and its proponents need to reckon with.
> wage of $15/hr-- a sum no less than twice the regional minimum wage
Cost of living for a single person in a 1-bedroom apartment outside the city center is about $2200 a month. Guess what? After taxes, that's more than you earn working 40 hours a week at this job. The only thing your snarky comment proves is that the regional minimum wage is criminally low.