I don't think so. Ultimately there's not enough information in prompts to produce "correct" code. And any attempt to deliver more information will result in a worse programming language, or as it is now, more iterations.
On top of that, there’s no reason an AI couldn’t ask additional questions to clarify certain details, just like a human would. Also as this tech gets faster, the iteration process will get more rapid too, where a human can give small bits of feedback to modify the “finished product” and get the results in seconds.
Eventually, human languages will be the only high-level programming languages. Everything else will be thought of the way we currently think of assembly code: a tool of last resort, used only in unusual circumstances when nothing else will do.
And it looks like "Eventually" means "In a year or two."
ChatGPT will not help with that.
This is pointless to argue though since it’s apparent there are people for which this just doesn’t fit into their workflow for whatever reason. It’s like arguing over whether to use an IDE.
I'm doing just that and it works surprisingly well. Currently it's as good as people with 2-3 years of experience. Do you really believe it's not going to improve?
Now I'm making a virtual webcam so it has a face and you can talk to it on a Zoom meeting...