Actually it is the least researched field among the most important, in my humble opinion.
I would rather say that your statements in this particular topic and wise statements per se are separate things entirely and what you have just claimed is not at all.
This essence of "lossy transmission" is simply our reality.
Do you have a pretty diverse range of experiences on psychedelics backing this up?
"The most 'logical' explanation" is very often a function of psychedelic usage (and various other experiences one may have had, or not).
> and as said: I have yet to see even the slightest piece of scientific evidence pointing to something else. Whereas there's enough of science supporting the way I think.
In actual science, an abscence of evidence is not proof of abscence though.
> I remain skeptical of course, though it's more of a 'I want to belive' type of thing.
For both sides!