> If victims would be primarily black or native that wouldn't change anything about the diabolic nature of the experiment but it would add a very relevant spin to it.

What if they were all poor and white, because the study creators didn’t care about poor people, but also were concerned about the clarity of the data for actually improving health for White people, viewing any possible variation introduced by a more representative study population as noise?

(Asking because that is, in fact, how the study was designed; at least, the targeting, the assumption about why it was targeted that way is an inference.)

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm0...

checked the wikipedia article. don't see how those two subjects relate. care to elaborate?

The Tuskegee Airmen and the Tuskegee Syphillis Study are two different things; you seem to be conflating them.