I truly wonder sometimes whether antibiotics are actually underused in medicine (while simultaneously being overused in the food supply chain).
I truly wonder sometimes whether antibiotics are actually underused in medicine (while simultaneously being overused in the food supply chain).
I think we underestimate the extent to which pathogens thrive in niches carved out by the absence of symbiotic bacteria required by our microbiomes.
Fecal transplants have shown significant results in some diseases (such as Crohn's): https://academic.oup.com/ibdjournal/article/21/3/556/4602907
> Based on [Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index], 7 of 9 patients were in remission at 2 weeks and 5 of 9 patients who did not receive additional medical therapy were in remission at 6 and 12 weeks.
> No or modest improvement was seen in patients who did not engraft or whose microbiome was most similar to their donor.
So I think it's either a case of pathogens that fit in with the established microbiome or that the microbiome is missing vital components.
We've started an arms race with a staggeringly dynamic enemy, and our solution thus far has been to attack them with static munitions, until those munitions stop working.
You can mitigate the issue with combination antibiotic therapy (it's harder to evolve resistance on multiple fronts simultaneously), but in general (when we use them) we need to move towards targeted antibiotics.
The difficulty being that you actually need to diagnose the specific problem before treatment, not just that it's bacterial in nature.
This requires pathogen detection and recognition: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941824/
This adds significant complexity (though I don't think that knowing what you're doing is a bad idea).
We've been using nukes for a long time now, we need to move to scalpels.
Killing gut microbiota is also being increasingly linked to diseases, so it's likely a very complicated balancing act where we need to maintain the correct bacterial flora.
At the same time we lack evidence-based medicine guidelines for treating most low-grade chronic bacterial infections. In many cases there aren't even reliable diagnostic tests for such conditions, so it's not clear what the root cause of a patient's symptoms are and physicians have to try treatments at random in an attempt to find something that works. More basic research is needed in this area.
This could just mean that diseases trigger same pathways. Overlap doesn’t mean a common etiology.
In the US, this is basically a given. You don't have to look past the lobbying numbers to understand why.
I'm curious outside the US, how often antibiotics are given out. From my buddies telling me stories about Mexico + the fear mongering with US Physicians, you'd expect a superbug to have broken out by now.
There is no mention on your page, or the wiki, that antibiotics are the cause the resistant bacteria.
I can logically see why we would believe this, but you'd expect given the use of antibiotics on the farm and in non US pharmacies; we'd have such a superbug scientifically proven by now.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/19/superbug...
Antibiotics, and antibiotic resistance genes, have existed for an uncountable number of megayears. Antibiotic use by humans is probably not creating many new antibiotic resistance genes, if any at all. But is is driving the increase in bacteria that contain these genes, as well as encouraging the horizontal transmission of antibiotic resistance genes and the accumulation of multiple such genes in so-called "superbugs".
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22757-1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30248271/
https://genomemedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s1...
You'd expect it, and it has.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methicillin-resistant_Staphylo...