Why would that be a reasonable assumption?
Minerals and Resources rules for exchange listing are pretty tight with respect filing third party independant reports that assess mineral volumes and estimates, economic feasibility, environmental impact, and human rights etc.
While it's possible that some things are covered up in these relatively modern capital projects (eg: like conditions mining copper in PNG in days of yore leaving substantial impacts today) it's unlikely due to modern communications and the known fact that everything gets out and doesn't remain hidden - more so today than back when PNG was literally and figuratively obscured by clouds.
Austrlia is keeping clean, and you can knock yourself out looking into
and report anything you find to the TSX.
Given the history of Canadian mining companies, I wouldn't trust any Canadian mining company listed on the TSX to give to shits about human rights.
Giving a shit about the environment, child exploitation, etc. by larger investment funds has increased in recent decades , there's been a rise in "ethical investment".
Ergo TSX companies care more when third party reports about bad practices are filed at the exchange.
Because it's absurd to think otherwise?
I mean, using OPs logic of "Because we all know international corporations never violate human rights?" you could say that about anything.
If you're a teacher you're probably a child molester because "Because we all know teachers never molest children, right?"
Apparently the law is “absurd”
Based on your comment, the legal presumptions of innocence is "absurd".
Codified systems are mutually exclusive with any amount of "agency". Agency is required for beliefs to exist.
Ipso facto blah blah blah you're just gonna keep believing some self-serving bullshit so whatever.
Sounds like you can't defend the point.
TBH you write like a bot trained on debatebro teenagers.
You don't even have to look overseas. PG&E has caused hundreds of billions of dollars in damage due to wildfires caused by cost cutting; they don't want to do the maintenance they're legally required to do. Entire communities are left homeless and people are killed. And the company gets a tiny fine and the executives get bonuses.
It's actually amazing to me that corporations don't do it more often. It pays to be a piece of shit company.