Several have found the TOS, screenshot it, and wildly proclaim that "Bluesky will own all your content!", all commenters gullible enough to accept this proclamation. Whilst the TOS is just the standard legalese needed to run a user-generated content site. These people are incompetent or misinformation agents, or both.
They zoom in on a missing feature and declare the product DOA. Whilst it is very obviously a beta.
They found "nazi content". It was actually a user replying to some progressive post expressing their dislike for the BLM movement. A raw opinion, not one I personally agree with, but not even close to "nazi". But even if you do think it's out of line, it's a bloody social network.
They go on to bash the moderation options of Bluesky, which I honestly find refreshing (if they actually work, that is). The idea is that the user can pick per controversial category to hide, warn, or allow. But the fact that you can chose "allow" is a problem, according to them. Except for porn of course, because the anarchist furry sex worker should most definitely not be censored.
Oh, and also, Musk is a nazi and so is Dorsey. None commenting seem to have a clue how these two characters relate to Bluesky, but better be safe than sorry.
It's just one bad take after the other, expressed by sour miserable people without investing a second in what they're so confidently judging.
I don't have any stake in Bluesky, but I feel for teams releasing amidst such hostility. If they can pull of nomadic identity, "chose your algorithm", functional federation, moderation without tyranny, we're looking at something quite exciting.