It isn't wrong to assume that strongest human are men, but I would argue it is not right to assume a professor is a man, Nobel Laureate is a man, nurse is a woman and so forth.

I don't think it is very high in the list of priorities, but I have no problem in making sure that those biases are not present in the ChatGPT output. This is not suppression of facts. The article is not talking about suppressing phrasing that right now you are more likely be a man if you have a Nobel prize, but it is talking about not assuming that you must be a man if you have a Nobel prize.