iOS 16 has hidden system to restrict specific feature based on user location
9to5mac.com
9to5mac.com
Some features may not be available for all regions or on all Apple devices
(https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213407)
Given (FTA) “Currently, Apple uses hard-coding techniques to restrict iOS features in specific locations”, it looks more like a refactoring to me (“we have several places where we try to determine the country a device is in. Let’s do that well in one place instead”) that makes the ‘feature’ less hidden.
Now: feature or misfeature? It depends on whether one wants Apple to act like a law abiding citizen. I would think almost everyone will say that depends on the law they’re abiding to, but opinions will differ on what laws they should fight. For example, should they prevent searches for abortion clinics or change country borders in maps depending on location?
Rather than there being some kind of protest or strike & the government disconnects the internet, with countryd here there seemingly is potential to fine-grained flip flags for what people can do on their devices at will.
Apple's regime of securing phones against their users intensifies. Amazing that Apple is making such bold leaps towards 1984 grade systems to spite & be petty about sideloading, is sliding into even worse paternalistic authoritarianism. To see a company so bitterly & visibly fight on the dark side of The War Against General Purpose Computing is incredible. The rebel anti-1984 Think Different spirit is writhing in it's grave, could not be more betrayed by these petty small minded chumps.
On my Mac and PC, I write tons of little programs and scripts to make my day easier. It’s great that any and all software runs.
But on my phone, I just want it to work reliably every time I pull it out of my pocket. I don’t want to hear from the rent-a-car place that I have to side-load their crappy invasive malware app on my phone if I want to rent a car (or do the same to order food at a hospital, or to use my new printer, or to shop at my grocery store, and on and on). Sideloading will open the floodgates to horrible crappy malware- or spyware-ridden apps that companies will force you to install, without the protections and benefits offered by the App Store. No thanks.
More so though, I think it's incredibly malignant a position to demand everyone else be trapped on a Think Apple paradigm forever. You're putting an extreme outside risk with no signs of being a problem ahead of everyone else having basic liberty to use the most important most popular electronic device on the planet (the smartphone) as they wish.
Apple should split into two companies if this is the path they want. The iPhone control apple shouldn't be given license to ruin & piss on the Think Different past like this. The small hew & cry of "I dont want to think" or let anyone else think is just the saddest.
That's a huge install base and seems to be a sign of a pretty bad system, no?
The system being that an major app provider wants to do something potentially shady, and the sideloading system allows it.
The whole world seems to have an “inevitable dystopia” vibe about it to me.
Open AI + Governments + World coin is the absolute epitome of it for me personally.
In this fight against side loading, it’s sad to see Apple doing the same things they made so much noise about opposing.
However, if this system allows "unlocking" of features that your current government has banned in your country when you go abroad without having to buy a new phone (for example now being able to use Facetime on your UAE bought phone automatically outside the UAE) then there is a small silver lining.
We both have our phones in silent-mode all the time so it was a noticeable and immediate change - and we couldn't turn it off.
Fortunately I knew the reason for it - to avoid having us ticketed for breaking the local law that requires all cameras to make an audible sound when a picture is taken.
As soon as we left Japanese airspace they returned to normal.
Amazing! Apple really cares about their UX!
Not in favour of crime, just don’t want someone who cares strongly enough they wish to throw the first stone for their cause, to go unnoticed or ignored… that would make it pointless violence instead of violent protest.
My first suggestion is the classic “wrap the rock in a piece of paper with your message on it” followed closely by fold the note up and tape it to the rock with good tape like duct/cloth tape but not in a way that won’t make it possible to remove the note and read it.
Apple should also be able to reasonably add T&Cs to the apple developer program which says that if someone wants to sell an app in, say, the EU on an alternate app store if they want to sell it on any country app store they must also offer it in the EU on the Apple app store.
This gives consumers more options, which, wasn't that the stated goal even if I strongly disagree with what the result will look like.
Which I don’t think is completely unreasonable. The gaming market also is much more diverse and competitive. Which is another argument against intervention .