Hmmm… I guess this puts Code Preview in the Netlify / Vercel camp… although those projects are richer in their feature sets around deployment tooling.
Is that a fair comparison?
Is that a fair comparison?
1. Netlify/Vercel handle production deployments while codepreview does not.
2. Netlify/Vercel have many more features than codepreview, still, codepreview is more flexible in what it can, do you want to pre-create users for each preview? no problem, do you SQS queues? you can get those, etc.
3. Vercel/Netlify are mostly about frontend previews (tied to js) while codepreview handles fullstack previews, in our demo, we showcase a web app preview built with Scala/Scala.js/Postgres, other stacks are supported too (like Java-based ones).
4. Vercel/Netlify charge per user while codepreview charges a fixed fee for all your users.
Hope my questions help you in making an sharper elevator pitch to customers.
You have reminded about a comparison chart we are drafted but never published.