https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2016/08...
https://data.census.gov/table?t=Marital+Status+and+Marital+H...
I’ve worked in an environment where there was a mix of grads from certificate, diploma and degree programs.
There were certain “profiles” of people that you would come to expect from each “bin” and 8/10 times your hunches were right.
Sure, maybe that one girl passed on you in your 20s because you didn’t have the right credentials, but there are plenty of other people out there.
It's not about the money, it's about the class, and also the pedigree. Blue-collar people are simply in a very different class than white-collar college-educated people. Their life experiences are completely different, and in the last few decades, with political polarization, their political views are 180 degrees different too.
I'm curious: Do you have a postgraduate degree, and if yes, would you be willing to data someone with "only" a BSc?
Let's say that someone has a PhD from a top university, for them to date someone without a BSc involves a greater gap than if someone with a mediocre BSc/BA from a community college dates an electrician.
> The background isn't important.
Here I disagree pretty strongly. An undergraduate will not provide the kind of class someone with multiple generations of doctors, lawyers, professors or "old money" tend to be instilled with during their childhood. Of course, those kids will almost always end up in college (if they're healthy).
In my experience, those from working class families tend fake their sophistication (often overcompensating) at least well into the 30s to compensate, if their education takes them into such circles.
In my experience, people who never went to college just have a very different outlook on life. There's a very good reason the political polarization in America today has a large component of being aligned along educational attainment.