I wouldn’t use it as a source of anything that the Russians would want to discredit (such as bellingcat).
That’s because we are seeing a lot more disinformation and propaganda in the past year, it’s a major part of Russias strategy to destabilise the west.
Their website literally publishes anti western pro authoritarian propaganda.
But if you want to just believe anything the Russian and other authoritarian regimes say go head.
> Do you think this wiki article is written in a neutral manner?
Yes.
Do you think so even after the "Trump-Russia" fiasco and Twitter Files?
>But if you want to just believe anything the Russian and other authoritarian regimes say go head.
Trying not to engage in binary thinking
No I think so after the very obvious Russian propaganda that is being pushed all over the internet.
There was even a notable uptick of Russian propaganda being pushed here after the war started.
> Trying not to engage in binary thinking
You haven't really addressed any of my points but thats okay, ill add some more for you, why do so many writers for MintPress Media have a history with working for Russias stated backed propaganda media arm RT?.
MintPress hiring ex-RT -> it's propaganda arm
On a serious note, I fail to see how RT is considered state-propaganda, but BBC is not
I have yet to see a single article on RT saying that maybe the war in Ukraine isn't a good thing and Russia should leave.
> MintPress hiring ex-RT -> it's propaganda arm
RT just serves as an extension for the Russian intelligence services as a propaganda arm, so if you have a problem with ex spooks working at bellingcat you should have a problem with ex-RT working at MintPress.
Bellingcat's investigation on Navalny's poisoning was entertaining as hell and I enjoyed it a lot, and I am not accusing them on lying in their reports. However they funded by National Endowment for Democracy which is CIA in disguise
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/02/20/reuters-bbc-uk-foreign-of...