edit: "applied to ARM-based hardware certified to run or running Microsoft windows". per wikipedia it looks like it is applicable to hw certified to run windows.
The actual requirements are titled Windows 8 hardware certification requirements and are linked below.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/windows/hardware/hh748188
I see no mention that the manufacturer cannot make other ARM tablets with Android or whatever. The quote given in the article is misleading in that respect.
What you imply doesn't make sense regardless, if ASUS makes a Win 8 ARM device, they would be forced to lock the Transformer Prime's bootloader? How does that even benefit MS and "lock out" Linux? That seems be actually locking Linux in!
What it says is that the manufacturer will have to make sure that, once you buy a Windows 8 ARM thingie, the only way to change the OS would be selling it on e-Bay and buying another. What would you say if your Dell desktop came with such a silly restriction?
Why would they even care? They are not planning to sell Windows ARM on Newegg like they do for x86.
>What would you say if your Dell desktop came with such a silly restriction?
iPads already come with such restrictions and MS has made it mandatory on x86 devices to have a open bootloader.
ARM desktops from Dell are way far away and have a steep incline to climb since won't run Win32 x86 apps.
I bet they would complain loudly. At least, they would before demanding the same from W8 manufacturers.
> MS has made it mandatory on x86 devices to have a open bootloader.
Unless I misread, they allowed x86 manufacturers to have open-able bootloaders and have the W8 approval seal. IIRC, no non-UEFI boxes will receive the seal.
> ARM desktops from Dell
Who said ARM desktops? I asked how would you feel if your current x86 desktop had a locked bootloader.
I totally lost you, why would MS care if Android forces locked bootloaders? How does that affect them in the least?
They aren't going to sell Win8 ARM in the stores, so again why would they complain? It makes zero difference to them.
iPads have locked bootloaders, how does that affect MS?
>Unless I misread, they allowed x86 manufacturers to have open-able bootloaders and have the W8 approval seal. IIRC, no non-UEFI boxes will receive the seal
Not just 'allowed', it's a requirement. How does non-UEFI boxes not getting the seal affect Linux? They aren't doing that because UEFI secure boot is a good defense against many common rootkits that load even before the OS or antivirus can.
>Who said ARM desktops? I asked how would you feel if your current x86 desktop had a locked bootloader.
There was an expectation about openness when I bought it. There will be no such thing with Win8 ARM. In fact, many users are replacing their laptops and desktops with iPads, so they seem to be okay with this.