> If one needs better performance or better guarantees about serialized data types, I guess one should use Protobuf
ProtoBuf is a horrible format. its not self describing like JSON, when it easily could be, without costing any extra bytes.
ProtoBuf is a horrible format. its not self describing like JSON, when it easily could be, without costing any extra bytes.
like if I have a message inside of a message vs just a bytes field that happens to have a valid protobuf?