Google would still be making a ton of money even with a CEO that did nothing.
For a $226M compensation, we should be able to demand a bit more don't you think?
For a $226M compensation, we should be able to demand a bit more don't you think?
I'd argue that most human beings never do anything worth even a million dollars, let alone hundreds of millions, especially execs.
The shareholders decide on the compensation of the CEO, that's literally it.
These responses asking who "we" are feels like (bad) attempts at justifying the hilariously inefficient salary, as if "it's none of your business" is the best counterargument to why they should be paid so much but provide so little.
Also, I and I'm sure many others here are shareholders, if that matters.
Are you a major shareholder?