Good points until you showed obvious bias with the "fake food" comment.
The last time we tried this expriment with novel new foods 10% of USA got diabetes.
Do tell me how your children will end up in 20 years of this kind of food.
If we were hunter gatherers who hunted megafauna then we ate TONS of meat in the past, so this is not a difference.
And there are also cultures who do fine without veggies, the Inuit.
What leads you to believe that the clear conflict of interests pointed out by OP changes in any way if OP doesn't use a marketing term to refer to their product?