Google Mars (2005)
google.com
google.com
There’s no real money in the planetary data. All of my colleagues who worked on that have gone on to Google and to work on Google Maps or Google Earth Engine, which do generate revenue. This project ended up ultimately being a recruitment effort on Google’s part.
Someday I'll write up the story, but that was a heck of a fun project!
Thanks for sharing.
Cracked me up
Edit: Searching through my notes, I realised I've been down this rabbit hole before. Here are some more of the same:
I work (~5% of my work week) on https://trek.nasa.gov/ . Our front page sucks, but the individual map browsers are quite rich in terms of available layers and tools. Our UI is... not optimized for discoverability, but there's a lot there. Mars is at https://trek.nasa.gov/mars/
2011 in the footer. Remnants of the old google of a by-gone era. Simultaneously feels both like yesterday and an eternity ago.
The video is from 2008: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX9MeF2Au9c
I bet whoever made this is no longer there and it has been forgotten about internally.
To wit: around the same time, Google tossed out some service that would listen to your computer's mic for room sounds (such as a TV broadcast), and provide helpful info.
I guess people were creeped out, thing was shut down, and now we have Amazon's version ...
A few months later, when Microsoft or whoever did their take on it, nobody cared anymore because it wasn't about principles.
At least in the unclassified imagery that has been made public... (cue eerie music)
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/new-interactive-mosaic-uses...
From the looks of it, it might be Tianwen-1 MoRIC (100m/px) data. But I'm not sure, I always have difficulty navigating non-NASA data sources.
I don't think the higher resolution HiRIC (up to 2.5m/px) data is publicly available. I don't also know what sort of coverage they have for it.
But in general it's not just having the data, stitching a global mosaic is a non-trivial effort. Afaik the Murray Lab mosaic took several years of work to make.
There is also HRSC from ESA that has been imaging Mars with fairly good resolution/coverage.
And finally also UAE Hope mission has produced global map, but I haven't been able to find their full-resolution data. https://nyuad.nyu.edu/en/news/latest-news/science-and-techno...
https://murray-lab.caltech.edu/CTX/V01/SceneView/MurrayLabCT...
They also have many other planets and celestial bodies here.
But also sad google hasn’t even kept the styling updated to their branding or added any features.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Pathfinder [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Martian_(film)
bdon, if you're reading this we need a protomaps archive for the moon and Mars :)
Feature: Olympus Mons
Type: Mons, montesalso the silver/gold infrared map reminds me of Brinstar in the original Metroid.
I don't necessarily fault Google--they have to do what makes sense for their business. But I wish, at the very least from a PR perspective, more companies would create cool things without worrying about whether they can be monetized.
- Small, nimble, fun, fast, low amount of cash, interesting work, ease to deploy
- Big, fat, tedious, slow, extensive supply of cash, maybe some interesting work at most, pain to get anything deployed