Fuck Oatly
fckoatly.com
fckoatly.com
The mainly young, white, middle class, female audience was wrapt in his performance. I couldn't stand more than a few minutes of it and left soon after arriving. I hadn't given it a second thought until seeing this shameless post-modern PR campaign on Hacker News.
The PR folks behind this have a future in politics, for sure.
Loved the cascade of fck-sites in the footer: fckoatly.com, fckfckoatly.com, fckfckfckoatly.com, fckfckfckfckoatly.com, ...
Of course, ymmv and Oatly might definitely have big issues but I didn't get it from this site.
> This was a lawsuit about copyright infringement
and then their replies mention that they were defending their trademark.
It appears that it was trademark related and not about copyright infringement which to my mind is far more acceptable. Companies have to defend their trademarks to keep them "active", but copyright infringement can be ignored by the owners if they wish.
I think the biggest issue is their ties to the Chinese government.
There are already alternatives to Oatly so no need to buy them anymore.
I use cow's milk for one thing: I put it in my coffee because it is a buffer solution which lowers the perceived acidity of the coffee and therefore gives it a milder taste. I've seen Oatly as an option at vegetarian coffee shops, but it does not have that chemical property of cow's milk, and adding it to coffee just makes it taste worse.
Simply the fact that they own it makes it look less problematic.
Note taken, this is how you handle controversies.
It is bold. But being bold doesn't make you right, it just makes you bold.
Important to remember that just owning it doesn't make the problems less real. They grow on Blackstone money. They market themselves to vegans and feed farm pigs on residue.
Eg look up permissible faecal, urine and pus levels where you are, versus other areas. Also, check out differences in store and hold requirements. Finally look at what substances cattle are allowed to be injected, or fed with. Each varies greatly.
Regarding the link, quite a good PR strategy, but not sure it's very interesting discussion for a tech site?