I mean clear labeling is always better than not, but if you have no actual options how much does it help?
Where I live my choice for actual wired broadband is: Spectrum. That's it. My only other viable Internet option is 25 mbps DSL from AT&T. So if I don't like the service from Spectrum: tough luck. If I'm looking at the label before ordering Spectrum and don't like what I see: tough luck.
And my situation isn't particularly rare.
And maybe you can use that label to more easily convince your local politicians that they should be giving more companies access to the poles.
Additionally, the FDA now requires nutritional and allergen info to be provided for restaurants, though it is sufficient to make them available online.
Here's a direct link to the doughnut store Krispy Kreme's nutritional facts for their Original Glazed® doughnut.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/kkd-e1-images.kktestkitchen.com/eco...
Or Dunkin' Donut's nutritional facts:
https://www.dunkindonuts.com/content/dam/dd/pdf/nutrition.pd...
and allergen info:
https://www.dunkindonuts.com/content/dam/dd/pdf/allergy_ingr...
FDA's fact sheet about this:
https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition/fdas-implem...
And I checked, and no T-Mobile and Verizon do not provide 5G fixed wireless service in this neighborhood. That was going to be my backup. AT&T LTE is available here, but it's no faster than DSL and during times of high load, it's much worse than DSL.
FML.
Maybe I'm missing something, but the labels use average speeds, not rated maximums.