Ask HN: how many points do I need to be able to censor others people's headlines?

My recent submission had a headline 'BBC fired respected scientist for denying man-made climate change'. It was censored by unknown editor to 'BBC ignored botanist for denying man-made climate change'.

The headline was not the best. It should have read 'banned' instead of 'fired', however anyone who has fired his lawyer would not be splitting hairs over the choice of words. The essence of the matter was clear to anyone.

What amazes me is why people attack the choice of words or the messenger (a tabloid in this case) when they should be arguing with the article itself?

So how many points should I get on HN before I can go around amending other people headlines to suit my religious beliefs?