As farmers' jobs were safe because farmers can use farming tools.

These arguments don't track even vaguely. You are doing the equivalent of analyzing the future of solar power by assuming solar will cost the same in 10 years as it does today, and that each new watt of solar is matched 1:1 with new units of demand. Neither of these are sensible.

It may be that ML code tools never displace many people, or even that they supercharge demand, but you don't get to justified conclusions by assuming the future is just the present but with a bigger UNIX timestamp.