> where and how could a larger lake have existed?
It exists somewhere in the gap of your logic. The undeying complaint is against the superlativ, and not against "largest" but "in Earth's history", which equates to everrr.
It's clearly click-bait.
It exists somewhere in the gap of your logic. The undeying complaint is against the superlativ, and not against "largest" but "in Earth's history", which equates to everrr.
It's clearly click-bait.
No comments yet.