Hacker News Reader

Comment by rtpg | Hacker News Reader

What I want is..

let MyEnum(foo, bar, baz) = input but otherwise { do some stuff return some value }

Point being I don’t have to check for MyEnum-ness twice (like with matches! + if let) and the indented code is for the exception (no match) not the norm.

Tho I … guess !matches(MyEnum{ .. }) is not the worst… but it’s annoying to have this pattern all over my code instead of as some encoded concept we all use

View on HN

You were pretty close with your hypothetical syntax! You can write:

  let Some(y) = x else { do_stuff(); return };

I think it was a fairly recent addition to Rust.

Thank dog for that. I feel like I even read the release notes for that but it was while I hadn’t been touching a specific codebase with loads of early returns. Thanks for pointing this out!

let-else was stabilised in 1.65.0, released 2022-11-03.

What determines whether `let Some(y) = x` evaluates to boolean true?

if x is `Some`, then `y` is set to the inner value and the following block occurs. you can also use this with other enums - i don't remember off the top of my head if it works for all enums, but you can at least also use it with `Result`

It absolutely works for all patterns!

The fact that the pattern matches.

Here the type being matched is:

    enum Option<T> {
        None,
        Some(T)
    }

    let x = Some(42);
    let Some(y) = x else { panic!("None") };

Reply on news.ycombinator.com