Hydrogen as fuel are expected to start to be used in the energy grid by the start of 2050 as earliest and more likely by 2080. They are not part for the actually strategy of the 2030 or the 2050 goal, and they are not part of the strategy to reach the Paris climate agreement. Their use is currently limited to only green steel production, and for now only in very limited trial runs which are heavily government subsidized.
The plans for carbon capture is also very far into the future, more likely to have a significant role in next century than this one. The only party that talks a lot of carbon capture is the fossil fuel industry, and according to them they would need around 150 billions in government subsidizes in order create the technology.
In both cases the cost is overwhelming too high. No one is investing into this except for government funded trial run. The ambition is obviously to use it in the future(tm). That sounds nice and is something politicians use, but its a fantasy if people think it will actually be used to reach the climate goals of 2030.
side note Language like "You seem to be intentionally missing the point" is pointless. You insult me, I insult you, it will just sound like children talking. Please skip it. If you have to address the author rather than the content, then simply don't write anything.