> The kicker is that some poor bastard was indicted for paying the "consulting" fee!
I mean the system works best if people on both sides of the equation are punished, right?
I mean the system works best if people on both sides of the equation are punished, right?
Practical example: Tuna boats in the Pacific have onboard observers from one of the island nations that own the EEZs that are fished. Observers are paid okay for their countries, but not really a lot of money in the grand scheme of things. It would be a net positive if they could accept a bribe from a crooked boat owner and then report it once on shore. Turn over the money (with maybe keeping a small finders fee) and then that boat’s owner gets penalized across the entire Pacific. Now there’s a very strong incentive not to offer bribes.