"the University reported this allegation to the Title IX Office and the police, but the Title IX Office did not pursue the matter as “the criteria for moving forward with an investigation were not met.”"
To be generous, they investigated it and found insufficient evidence. To a cynic, they superficially "investigated" it.
Imagine if they had just referred the “assault” accusation to the police. I expect the student would not have killed herself.
You made this up again, did you?
Do you think they spent equal or similar resources on the two events? What do you think I’m making up?
>"Imagine if they had just referred the “assault” accusation to the police."
But the previous comment (and mentioned link) says:
>"the University reported this allegation to the Title IX Office and the police"
I.e., they did refer it to both the school administration and the police. It was apparently not found to be worth pursuing. For more context:
"Mostofi also addressed the allegation that a football player sexually assaulted another player on the women’s soccer team. Mostofi wrote that the University reported this allegation to the Title IX Office and the police, but the Title IX Office did not pursue the matter as “the criteria for moving forward with an investigation were not met.”[1]
To be generous to the OP, they may be wondering why you are implying they should continue to spend resources on something they already investigated and found without merit. We shouldn't be investigating as part of a dog-and-pony show.
[1] https://stanforddaily.com/2022/11/25/parents-of-katie-meyer-...
https://www.kennedy.senate.gov/public/press-releases?ID=26B5...