I tried it with exactly one query, something specific that had come up recently in my work. I was looking for one sentence of answer. It was terrible, giving me 500 words of blather, much of which which was irrelevant and some of which was 100% wrong. It was absolutely the arrogant kid who had skipped most of the lectures but who expected to be able to BS through the exam enough to pass the class.

For my needs it was a pure waste of time, and it would have been a bigger waste of time had I not already known enough to judge its output. So I would call this worse than Google and also worse than nothing at all. I suspect this is an inherent problem with LLMs, not something fixable. But in the spirit of constructive criticism, I'd suggest you consider that for programming use cases, no answer is better than a bad answer.