Walmart to add EV charging to thousands of stores by 2030
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
https://www.truecar.com/best-cars-trucks/fuel-electric/price... https://www.kbb.com/best-cars/best-used-electric-cars-under-...
The e-golf and fiat are available delivered if I was really dead-set on those.
None of that negates my point in any way.
*In the US
That’s why the Corolla is as popular as it is.
It's on the list sure, but no sedan is the massive mainstream seller that they used to be.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2023/01/the-average-new-car-pri...
If you look at the top 25, many are over that $30k number:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/g39628015/best-selling-car...
If you're not a Musk fan, the field is becoming competitive. There's a handful of models with 150+mi range that are in the <$30k USD bracket when new, and many models on the used market are now <$30k USD as well.
And just because you are charging at WalMart doesn't mean you need to be shopping there on the regular.
An EV fast-charger is not designed to be your neighborhood gas station, they're more like travel stops. Since most EVs will sit in a driveway for 8-10hrs a day, even a 120v charger should get you ~40 miles in that time frame. You should ideally be able to keep your vehicle topped up on Level 1 or Level 2 (240v) charging and DC Fast Charging is more of a road-trip or extended range system.
Most fast-charge capable cars can hit go from 10%-80% in 30-45 minutes, which is a decent amount of time to hit a convenient Wal-Mart for travel snacks and leg stretching. It sounds like a valid idea when put that way.
In my place you get 20% less for 10% more, but Tesla still looks flashy and I feel a bit like a wanker. Much worse for my partner who hoards free stuff, esp kids toys from giveaway FB groups :|
It's weird how much a car's price and perceived price can vary when you actually look at how things depreciate. Seeing a Quattroporte and F-150 King Ranch next to each other and noting that used the Maserati is a $15k car and while the truck is nearly $75k is really odd. Teslas hardly depreciate at all through, so I guess that adds to it.
How can this be if the battery is a huge portion of the vehicle’s cost and it has a limited lifetime?
As a rule of thumb, the battery in a long range EV (NMC or NCA chemistry) will have 70% of its original range after 1200 full charge cycles (charging 0-100% 1200 times, or charging 25-75% 2400 times) So a car with 350mi range when new will have 245 mile range after about 400,000 miles.
EVs with lithium-iron batteries (LFP chem) have shorter range (250 miles or so) but they can do about 3000 cycles or 700,000 miles before their range falls to 70%, or 175 miles. Still potentially useful, depending on how far you need to go.
I would imagine most of the EVs on the road today will succumb to rust or collisions before their battery gives out.
The price of used Teslas has plummeted by 20% in recent months.
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1139159_tesla-model-3-l...
20 million in 2009. Over 200 million in 2015.
Now the numbers won’t nearly be the same but hopefully it’s enough to end this silly conversation.
Here are some Tesla numbers that go back 7 years. Now add several car companies then extrapolate
https://www.statista.com/statistics/502208/tesla-quarterly-v...
Cheap and easy always seems to win over any kind of politics or love of a certain type of real product.
Right now, you buy EVs because you care about the environment or want people to think you do, or because you're a tech enthusiast, but everyone else seems to have some sentimentality for gas engines.