Horgan isn't exactly wrong. Accepting "established science" is always anti-science. How will you know Einstein was correct if you don't endeavor to test his hypothesis?
"Unestablished" "science" tends to skip one or more of these. A lot of "soft" sciences also skip a lot of steps before publishing findings.
The most commonly skipped one is describing experiments in sufficient detail for them to be possible to reproduce. The other is making unwarranted conclusions from a special group or situation.