From sand to processor, or how a CPU is made
newsroom.intel.com
newsroom.intel.com
http://download.intel.com/pressroom/kits/chipmaking/Making_o...
http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/chipmaking/pdfs/Sand...
An example being the sentence "Sand, especially quartz, has high percentages of silicon in the form of silicon dioxide (SiO2) and is the base ingredient for semiconductor manufacturing." which seems to have been copied almost word for word.
Other parts of the article appear to have been simply rewritten from other - more reputable/original - sources too.
So to sum up, this source shouldn't be upvoted, IMO.
Also as an FYI, I love how Google rank this on page 1 for [How a CPU is made]... (indeed, above the original sources)
Maybe other sources are more reputable/original, but this article sums them up nicely and in an enjoyable read, which those PDFs are not (from image quality to layout). Form indeed matters.
And it's not really witch hunting - I'm merely pointing out that it's bad form for someone to plagiarise and not attribute the source.
Still not a fan of word-for-word copying, but at least links have been added :)
Isn't it funny we can't find anything about where that sand comes from?
One of the things I found most interesting is that large sections of the manufacturing sections of the building sit on isolated vibration controlled platforms and there are 'Earthquake" sensors all over the place that can shutdown the plant if too much movement is detected. You can imagine that any vibration causes issues at such small scales. Some of the control platforms/benches are active, meaning they sense any vibration and counteract it using various kinds of actuators.
There are also a lot of really nasty chemicals that go into this. When they say 'Etch' they really mean 'melt it away with a really strong acid'. The materials used for donor doping, usually phosphorous or arsenic are really quite toxic chemicals not helped by the fact that these are often used in gaseous form for implantation and are colorless/oderless. The acceptor dopants are at least pretty harmless most of the time (gallium or boron). Many types of photoresist can also be really dangerous from a safety standpoint. Its pretty impressive that semiconductor plants operate as safely as do, choked up primarily to heavy automation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GQmtITMdas
How Its Made touched on it too: