For me 16GB RAM and 1TB SSD is kind of the minimum (I would buy 32GB RAM if I can get it for a fair price). I can get that for less than 1000 EUR as a Windows/Linux notebook with reasonably good quality. For Apple it seems to start at 2300 EUR with these specs, and that is for relatively small screen sizes which doesn't match my preference. Of course there are many more differences here, but this seems to be kind of the price floor for reasonable specs.
Please by all means provide a link.
Often when you see these sort of comparisons it's low spec screens, memory + SSDs.
All tech in Europe is costlier. Check Dell 2023 XPS lineup and compare to macbooks - it won't get come out cheaper.
If you spend 1250e you can get oled screens which are nicer then apple
https://www.coolblue.nl/en/product/904043/asus-zenbook-14-um...
Not the same. 1080 would be unbearable compared to a MacBook pro screen at 14” (3024x1964).
Edit: the oled one has acceptable resolution. I don’t see any specs on the ssd though so it may be SATA junk. The problem with other manufacturers is that they aggressively skimp in all the places people don’t look. Part of what you get for the Apple tax is some assurance that’s not happening.
So OP is right in that options are present that are cheaper and perhaps better for his use case.
edit: oled laptop comes comes with PM9A1 ssd which has 7GB reads, 5GB writes which is faster then Apple too (apple has 5GB reads, 4GB writes).
And we're not talking about a bit of money here, Macbooks with reasonable specs start at around double the cost of a better mainstream PC notebook.
Oh boy. I suppose selling a "PC" (iMac, Mac Mini, etc) at desktop prices with laptop internals isn't skimping.
Meanwhile I built a PC for 1/4 of what it would cost me to build an equivalent Mac Pro a few years ago. It still stands up to the M2 chip today. I'll probably be rocking this one for another 5 years.
PC OEMs stopped using SATA SSDs years ago. Entry-level NVMe SSDs are both cheaper and faster than SATA SSDs built around the same quantity and type of flash.
Apple M2: https://browser.geekbench.com/search?k=v6_cpu&q=5900HX+&utf8...
Ryzen 9500HX: https://browser.geekbench.com/search?k=v6_cpu&q=m2&utf8=
That's the one I have, or at least similar. It's obviously not the same as a MacBook, but the screen is a 16:10 high-resolution, though not Retina one with good quality.
People care about different things, and Full HD screens at ~14-15" is perfectly fine for many people. And you can get that for even cheaper than what I mentioned.
MacBook Pro 14: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21032882
AMD Ryzen 7: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21032882
I had an Acer with 16GB of RAM and 512GB SSD since 2016 for something like 850-900 Euros back then and it wasn't some high-end gaming machine. Of course this Apple machine is much better than mine, but the comparison is to highlight what insane markups Apple is charging today on SSD and RAM configs that are years out of date. No wonder their profits are so good.
Also, considering how poorly the base single channel 256GB SSD performs on the M2 machines, I wouldn't be surprised if my 7 year old Samsung 850 EVO SATA SSD would actually beat it.
When you start getting up to the models with 16gb ram/512gb disks, which I consider an absolute minimum, their price is jut too insane for many tech users.
I just priced out an M2 MBA with ram & ssd maxed out. $2499 USD in the US and 33009kr in Sweden. $2499 is 26163kr, +25% VAT is 32705kr. So you're paying 304kr / $29 more than the US price.
I guess New Hampshire has an Apple Store 45min from Boston airport, and Delaware has one about the same time from Philadelphia airport.
So just going "what's that in dollars" either ignores the real discrepancy, or at the very least, misplaces the blame.
Also, fun fact - since I did that math 3 hours ago, SEK has changed enough to wipe out that $29. Right now, (33009 * 0.8) SEK in USD = US$2460.46, making the pre-tax price in Sweden cheaper than the pre-tax price in the US.
So if you want to do it legally you’ll have to add 20-25% to the price which no longer makes it very appealing.
Do you still have to pay if the Mac is out of the box and you have used it?
It so happens that there are databases used by the customs agents that can trace back serial numbers to countries and purchase locations.
So trying to make up a story on a random control can turn out pretty bad.
Being caught on lies where we actually bought our phones or cameras, while being controlled on the French/Swiss border wasn't that out of the ordinary.
Most of the time not at all, and then you get that one that wants to show off or had a bad day.
You can also buy a house much quicker in Europe if you find a way not to pay 50% of your income in tax… oh and that Porsche now looks quite affordable too..
Not it's not. What are you even talking about? Buying goods for personal consumption/usage and bringing them into is perfectly legal..
Unpack, put it in your backpack, boom it's your personal item.
Why would it be illegal if you just bought a single laptop for personal usage?
[1] https://appleinsider.com/articles/21/07/09/iphones-worth-134...
https://www.republicworld.com/india-news/general-news/in-mum...
Environmentally I also dont like the push for minor increments every year across their range of products, and then forced 'obsolete' rating for perfectly working devices. I have a box full already thanks. I hope to use my current machine until it physically breaks, and then switch to open-hardware.
No one is expecting you to buy a new laptop every year, even if Apple does updates each year. Other people are buying new machines on their own timelines that do not synchronize with you. They are able to get the latest machine available when they are ready to buy.
Cars are updated every year but you don't feel the same pressure to update, do you?