But that has been predicted for every new increase in automation, so maybe we‘ll be wrong again.
Knowledge workers. Programmers. White collar workers.
Y'know, the ones least likely to be starving before they get replaced by a glorified autocorrect.
Instead of thinking of things like "payroll tax" and such being a tax on humans - change it to a tax on (for lack of a better word) productivity.
Tax the robots.
https://news.mit.edu/2022/robot-tax-income-inequality-1221
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot_tax
https://fortune.com/2023/02/21/bernie-sanders-bill-gates-rob... ( https://archive.is/Y90NU )
To benefit from automation, you need to take the initiative to integrate automation into your own workflow. The idea that someone else will automate your job, but you will somehow benefit is a fantasy.
If we do get UBI, it won't replace lost wages from losing your job. Most of that money will go to the team at your company who set up GPT to do your work and the rest will be distributed among shareholders.
This is Calvinist "only those who work deserve to live" bullshit.
> If we do get UBI, it won't replace lost wages from losing your job. Most of that money will go to the team at your company who set up GPT to do your work and the rest will be distributed among shareholders.
And this just doesn't make sense. Do you know what "UBI" even means? By definition, it goes to the people. All of them. Universally, even.
Even if your claim is that somehow your UBI will be sucked up by inflated costs, I don't see how it follows that it goes to your company.
Every single UBI experiment that has been tried has ended in failure.
It is borderline insanity to retry such an experiment and expecting a different result without bankrupting an entire country just for those sitting around doing nothing.