Polish Prime Minister suspends the ACTA ratification
translate.googleusercontent.com
translate.googleusercontent.com
http://prawo.vagla.pl/node/9662 (Polish) http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&... (translation)
Executive summary: It doesn't matter what Tusk says, Poland will be covered by ACTA when EU ratifies it.
If EU ratifies ACTA, but Poland not, "only" the part of ACTA that is under EU competentions will be binding ("only", because that's like 90% of the whole treaty).
But it is debatable if Poland has even the possibility to never ratify a signed treaty.
Also - any new law has to be compatible with signed international treatis, even if these treaties are not ratified).
If that is so, then how would Poland withdraw from a treaty that it has entered? In the U.S., the government can withdraw from a treaty simply by passing a law doing so. Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957) ("when a statute which is subsequent in time is inconsistent with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict renders the treaty null").
But IANAL, just have read about ACTA etc recently, mostly on Vagla blog.
Consultations are to be started Monday at 1400 local time.
"A State is obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty when:
(a) it has signed the treaty or has exchanged instruments constituting the treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, until it shall have made its intention clear not to become a party to the treaty; or
(b) it has expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty, pending the entry into force of the treaty and provided that such entry into force is not unduly delayed."
I'm Polish and I have to honestly admit: my country has so many stupid political leaders, that I often feel just helpless about it.
Second thing, let's don't be naive. Tusk knows very well that what was there to sign in Japan, has been signed. It's to late to stop certain things, it's all cold thinking about the popularity and the party has to be punished in the elections anyway... although the alternative is still terrible...
The left? Lots of scandals which they tried to deny/cover. Lost trust, their new leader perceived as sleazy. The "right"? They cater to religious old people and their fears of change. PSL? Farmers' & big food interests. Palikot? He is the one catering to the young (reduce influence of the church, legalize MJ) but IMHO he's trying too hard to be perceived as trustworthy.
However I'm a bit sad the protests happened so late and only in Poland. ACTA had been negotiated since 2008, the final draft being leaked online in 2010... Since some members including USA signed already on 1 October 2011, realistically it already was to late to stop it.
Maybe if SOPA had happened 1 year earlier, the spillover activism could have stopped ACTA too? :/
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/gazeta-wyborcza-20120203.text
--jchhttp://news.google.pl/news/story?ncl=dt6kARLjrYdhuXMdAaT2Ct-...
PM Tusk pretends to be making mends with the outraged internet community. I wonder if anyone will buy that b#llsh!t.
On the other hand, Poland is still pretty awesome to have some actual public debate about ACTA. In most countries, 99% of citizens haven't even heard that acronym, not to mention understanding it or agreeing / opposing it.
As for ACTA being ratified by EU, Polish government admitting that they were wrong will help in killing it in the EU parliament. I can't imagine any polish party voting "FOR" now.
Finally - the thing I'm really hoping that will happen is that the future changes in the law will be consulted with the society. Politicians will think thrice before signing a copyright extension law, or software patent laws.
Edit: but you're right. Our government kept telling us that the signature means nothing, because our Sejm needs to still ratify ACTA. Now I'm hearing that polish Sejm can do jack to stop the ratification, wtf.