Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991)
usenet.trashworldnews.com
usenet.trashworldnews.com
A bigger issue was that Google buried all the archives from the Usenet with it.
> A bigger issue was that Google buried all the archives from the Usenet with it.
Indeed. Killing usenet was bad. Burying the archives was unforgivable.
Good news: we are; we have a parallel implementation running on the
GRIP multiprocessor, with absolute wall-clock speedup over the same
programs running on a comparable uniprocessor (never to be taken
for granted!). This has only recently sprung to life, so it will be
a while before we can report proper results.
Bad news: it only runs on GRIP at present, so that rather limits its
distribution. We have access to a Meiko transputer machine, but it
is quite a lot harder to deal with a distributed memory architecture. The
compiler would port rather easily to a shared-memory multiprocessor,
but we don't have access to one at present.
[1] https://usenet.trashworldnews.com/?thread=878480