Imagine you and your friend are playing with flashlights in a dark room. You shine your flashlights on a wall with two small openings (slits) close to each other. When the light from both flashlights goes through these openings and reaches the other side, you notice a cool pattern on the wall with light and dark lines. This is called an interference pattern, and it happens because light behaves like a wave.
Now, in this experiment, scientists did something similar but instead of using two small openings on a wall, they created two very short moments in time when light could pass through. They called these moments "time slits." They used a special material called Indium-Tin-Oxide and high-power infrared light to create these time slits.
When they looked at how the light changed after going through these time slits, they saw a pattern similar to the one you'd see with the two openings on the wall. But, they were surprised to find that the pattern had more lines than they expected based on the current understanding of how light interacts with the material.
This discovery means that the material changes much faster than previously thought, and it challenges the theories scientists had so far. This experiment also opens the door for creating new materials that can control light in exciting ways, like making it go backward or changing its path. These new materials could be useful in many areas, like making better computers and improving communication technologies.
Isn't coherence needed?
>a pattern similar to the one you'd see with the two openings on the wall
The pattern was in the frequency domain, i.e. the color of the light changed.
No need to be explicitly wrong, even if explaining on a lower level. In fact, the betrayal felt when one later learns a contradictory (not clarifying) truth is bad for learning.
Space and time in general relativity are but inseparable axes of the same spacetime. But, unlike completely interchangeable and real space axes (e.g. "length, width. depth"), the time axis is slightly special: it's counted as imaginary (see Minkowski space: the distance contracts along the time axis). But otherwise it's an axis like width of height or length.
Quantum "particles" are also "waves", that is, they behave a bit like both, but not exactly like your normal grains of sand or water waves. Like particles, they are "separate", so you can count electrons or photons, and can't cut them in half Like waves, they are wavy and fuzzy, without a sharp edge or border, and interact like waves. When one wave's hump meets another wave's trough, they cancel out ("destructive interference"). When two humps meet, they reinforce each other, resulting in a bigger hump ("constructive interference", yes, sounds ironic).
This is easy to imagine in the space domain, with normal waves that go, say, "up" and "down". With experiments with photons the waves represent the strength of the electromagnetic field, and the interference pictures are ring-like.
Now replace one of the dimensions of the ring with time. This will mean that instead of e.g. darker / brighter circles or stripes on the picture, you will detect "bands" or "stripes" of higher / lower intensity spread over time. Intensity changing over time is oscillation. E.g. air pressure oscillating over time is sound. Electromagnetic field oscillating over time is radiation: radio waves, light, x-rays, etc.
So the experiment managed to let two photons through "slits" in time rather than in space, by opening a "hole" for them to pass and then closing it back really quickly, so that two photons would pass the opening really close in time to each other. This is similar to how the typical double-slit experiment puts slits (or holes) really close by in space, so that the photons can't be far away from each other while interacting.
Then they registered the interference picture, which, AFAICT, was a burst of various electromagnetic frequencies (a "spectrum"). Each photon has a very well-defined frequency (or wavelength, or color, for visible light). So seeing a variety of different frequencies ("colors") would be a tell-tale sign that interference happened, producing multiple "stripes" in the time domain, not space domain.
So they are red shifting or blue shifting the photons? And sending the red/blue shifted photons with a very small time delay?
So yes, I think our understanding more or less matches: they likely register red/blue shifted photons with small time delays between the same "colors".
Can you elaborate on this or provide more context/reading links.