How Stop-Motion Movies Are Animated at Aardman (2021) [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
The fire/explosion effects look very CG though.
They say they're compositing this through lots of layers of physical objects. Have a look at the fire-shaped cut-outs at around 7m11s. It seems like they are emulating the CG-animated look in a very roundabout way? Cause that's what kids are used to and want, or what?
Edit: Just scrubbed through the actual short movie (Robin Robin; https://www.netflix.com/title/81058433). It has a more typical Aardman-look than what those clips in this video show.
In the very first seconds of the report you see a complex animatronic cat moving across a blue ackground that will be used to cut away scaffolding, stitch together different parts of the movie etc.
What they mean to say, I believe is "we want to do as much in camera as possible, and use CGI as the last resort". That's why they specifically mention that snowflakes are hand-animated in-camera.
And other recent films using 3-d printing to create the many varied faces and posed hands of the "puppetoons" is acceptable as well.
When I watch the old "Rudolph" animated films I cringe a bit when they add the rotoscoped snow on top of the otherwise 3D animated figures/sets. Aardman seems to have struck the right balance.
Personally I don't much care for the purist stance. Making things in the most challenging way possible does not automatically make them better.