Also, often the test itself is somewhat invasive. Sticking various apparatuses into our bodies comes with all kinds of risks, so it better be worthwhile to do it.
Also a blood test and urine sample aren't invasive and come with ~0 risk.
> We should ALWAYS strive to have more and better data.
If you value data in and of itself, in other words if data is an a priori good, then this is a fetish.
For example, if you have a positive test for cancer, they will persuade you to follow it up. They will apply very emotionally manipulative techniques.
Another example, if the patient does not have the ability to decide for themselves, the doctor's opinion will hold a very heavy weight and can lead into a legal issue.
If you believe that science and medicine in 2023 is offering complete understanding and solutions to all or even many problems, then you will naturally feel like these two examples should be handled that way. However, the daily "revelations" of "new medical research" which contradict past results and understandings should be enough to cause doubt in that high level of confidence.