But I can see how someone who wasn’t there might think this is what it was like.
But I can see how someone who wasn’t there might think this is what it was like.
It’s weird how that thing can be sassy and rap, but seems unwilling to generate « bad internet comments » It’s hard to get anything but bland content.
ChatGPT pseudo-history. We need to educate our kids with this.
If you have to do that, what's the point?
And of course, few will actually double-check it. Easy is more important than correct.
> So this concern might be rephrased as (something like) "Kids will need to learn how to use GPT to validate secondary sources."
That's not a rephrase, it's an inversion. It's like saying kids will need to learn to validate medical advice from their doctor with information from mercola.com and other random alternative-health blogs.