Indeed, but they're saying it with no evidence whatsoever. If those jobs actually do get replaced by LLMs people will be entitled to say that with certainty. Until then it's just their opinion, and not one that aligns with what I know of any of the jobs I regularly come in contact with.

> they're just saying that most of the work out there is

And I stated that I cannot think of a human job in which intelligence is not required, which cannot be replaced by deterministic automation.