I have used it for many non software things as well, and again very useful.
I think my needs are too specific, and often too nebulous.
Also, just a bit chapped about falling for the hype.
But the human will learn, through reasoning and challenges... Those features of which some wonder whether they will emerge are critical pieces.
That depends on the human, what they're trying to learn, and how it's taught to them.
Some people with brain damage, learning disabilities, other cognitive issues, with poor teachers or learning materials, or with too difficult a task will not learn.
It might be useful to view AIs as akin in some ways to brain damaged humans, who might be good at some tasks but deficient at others.
I have a hunch it’s much better suited to get context specific summaries for further good old “RTFM”. And that in itself would be cool enough if people would actually go and “fact check” the outputs which I guess (and telling from comments) is often not the case.