That's right and then they go and find stuff that is not appropriate.
This is not about what they are given, it's about what they have access to.
This is not about what they are given, it's about what they have access to.
But most kids don't manage to do that for some time. School libraries (typically) don't have porn in them, and internet access is often supervised or limited.
The root of this thread quoted the article selectively. The full quote is:
> It added OpenAI does not verify the age of users and exposes "minors to absolutely unsuitable answers compared to the their degree of development and self-awareness."
That is very reasonable take, especially given how insane ChatGPT can be.
I understand it's important, but I hate bureaucratic "solutions" that are technically correct but don't actually fix the issue.
Or I supposed they could sell their models as packaged software, and the store clerk can check the ID.
The model of standalone packaged software has several benefits to consumers, and privacy is one of those.
Reinforcement learning is the technique they use, and that means they are feeding the machine good text or image generations, produced by the machine. This means that the data are mushed together in the weights of billions and trillions of other data, and there is no way to get them back.