The Three-Legged Stool: A Manifesto for a Smaller, Denser Internet
publicinfrastructure.org
publicinfrastructure.org
You want a digital public sphere? Vote for the government to open a digital post office. Until we have the right to access, at cost, public services that do not discriminate and cannot be denied us by anything short of a court order, digital freedom is proportional to how much money you can make for someone else.
As someone who transitioned from law and finance to tech, it's apparent that a greater reckoning must take place. Trying to graft tech on to what is essentially an early 20th century paradigm bodes well for the entrenched interests.
While I appreciate the distinction you've made in your post, I would encourage you to not use the word "person" to refer to corporations. I understand the judicial precedent--I'm saying that the law is wrong and we should absolutely not adopt the definition of corporations as persons in to the English language. Corporations don't have rights; they exist to serve people who do have rights. Legal precedent granting corporations rights under the law is a morally reprehensible mistake which should be corrected.
gotta transition from a mindset of trading merchandise to a mindset of (technologically possible) non-scarce digital assets.
and we've traded merchandise for more than a few thousands of years, so I see a problem larger than just 20th century paradigms.
but trade is a bit nonsensical on digital stuff, as NFTs clearly demonstrated, so it's not a trivial issue
I mean a lot of public utilities and services communicate with twitter, instagam or facebook. So essentially giving these free services an audience. With these services ratcheting down their free access to the public (instagram for example, shows a limited number of things before you have to sign in) it would make sense to move to more open services (Mastodon?) Of course then they'd have to pay but I can't imagine that would be a problem.
https://rss.nytimes.com/services/xml/rss/nyt/World.xml https://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
I went back and it looks like in the article/pdf they're proposing using their (Umass Amherst's) "smalltown" software.
https://publicinfrastructure.org/2022/09/28/welcome-to-small...
which is a Mastodon Fork:
RSS is my primary way of following the web these days (well has been for a couple of decades). If there's no RSS feed I simply don't follow a site; there usually is.
You want people to be able to find you, for your outbound communications (self-promotion), and you want people to be able to cold-contact you in circumstances that are useful to you. But if you're not very careful your inbound communications get completely overwhelmed by spam and/or abuse.
Discovery is work. Spamblocking is work. Abuse deletion is work. None of which people want to do themselves, so they delegate it to platforms which do it for them.
Sure, but this is a 1 time cost and most people already have an account. I'm sure it also takes several minutes to set up your internet or phone too.
>and never got the phone number confirmation code
Are you potentially using a phone number from a service like twilio instead of your actual phone number? VoIP and related numbers are usually banned because they are mostly used by malicious users.
Keeping track of the posts you've like is a feature of the app. Personalization is also another feature of the app. Tracking the time you have the app open is why you can see your screen time and how you can set screen time limits. These are features which users find value.
If you don't want this data to last a century you can just delete your account and your data will be deleted too.
I don't consider any web site or service that requires a phone number to be provided in order to create an account to be "free", both in terms of cost and liberty.
No, you can sign up with just an email address assuming you don't look like a bot.
As far as I'm considered, Instagram absolutely needs a phone number. Officially they don't need one at sign up - but they won't allow you to use that account for long before you need a phone number anyway.
And hypocrisy is the good interpretation: that they know what they're doing and don't care, for whatever reason, about the irony of hosting their "Manifesto for a Smaller, Denser Internet" on Google's very unpublic infrastructure. The worse interpretation is that they're completely clueless.