interesting. i apparently opened that image, then forgot about it, and without context saw it later. i looked at it, thought wow that's a cool picture from back in the day, looked at the people in it, and left.

i now ran into your comment (with a purple link) and did some reflection. upon reexamination, its clear that the picture is fake (because im looking for it) but when i wasn't looking for it, its interesting how all the "hot spots" or interesting pieces of the picture are pretty good and the (imo) lackluster parts are the "less interesting" pieces like the end of the roads where it it blurs out. i wonder if that bias is inherently ingrained in the system.